|By Virtualization News||
|September 11, 2008 11:00 PM EDT||
In light of today’s explosive IT infrastructure growth and complexity, organizations are increasingly adopting virtualization as a means of consolidating IT resources, simplifying management, and minimizing overhead. One of the most complex issues facing VMware users trying to fully capitalize on virtualization is managing, allocating, and protecting virtual data as they would actual data. Chris will discuss a three-pronged approach to tackling issues around virtual data in VMWare. He will provide insight on how to create a single, integrated, comprehensive and centralized interface for administering VMware data through a virtual storage infrastructure that complements VMware virtualization technology.
Christopher Poelker is VP Enterprise Solutions, FalconStor. Prior to this, he was a storage architect at HDS. Before HDS, Chris was a lead storage architect at Compaq, where he built the sales/service engagement model for Compaq StorageWorks, and trained VARs and Compaq ES/PS on StorageWorks. His certifications include MCSE, MCT, MASE, A+ certified.
Submissions on these and dozens of other topics have already begun streaming in. The Call for Papers is as always a 100% online process, found here.
Sponsor Virtualization Conference & Expo
Register Now and Save!
Submit Your Speaking Proposal
In short, Virtualization is fast becoming a key requirement for every server in the data center, enabling increased workloads in server consolidation projects, efficient software development and testing, resource management for dynamic data centers, application re-hosting and compatibility, and high-availability partitions.
Topics will include:
- Desktop Virtualization
- File Virtualization
- The Future of the Virtual Enterprise
- Hosted Virtualization
- Virtualization Hardware Support
- Hardware-level Virtualization
- Storage Virtualization
- Virtualization for Server Consolidation and Containment
- Windows Virtualization
- Utility Computing
- State of the Virtualization Services Market
Feb. 10, 2016 09:30 AM EST
Feb. 10, 2016 09:00 AM EST Reads: 379
Feb. 10, 2016 09:00 AM EST Reads: 180
Feb. 10, 2016 08:00 AM EST
Feb. 10, 2016 07:45 AM EST Reads: 433
Feb. 10, 2016 07:00 AM EST
Feb. 10, 2016 12:45 AM EST Reads: 197
Feb. 10, 2016 12:00 AM EST Reads: 205
Feb. 9, 2016 10:15 PM EST Reads: 242
Feb. 9, 2016 05:00 PM EST Reads: 176
Feb. 9, 2016 04:00 PM EST Reads: 611
Feb. 9, 2016 03:15 PM EST
Feb. 9, 2016 02:45 PM EST Reads: 208
Feb. 9, 2016 02:15 PM EST Reads: 405
Feb. 9, 2016 01:15 PM EST Reads: 383
Feb. 9, 2016 11:30 AM EST Reads: 417
Feb. 9, 2016 07:45 AM EST Reads: 101
Feb. 6, 2016 03:30 PM EST Reads: 759
Feb. 5, 2016 09:00 PM EST Reads: 819
WebRTC has had a real tough three or four years, and so have those working with it. Only a few short years ago, the development world were excited about WebRTC and proclaiming how awesome it was. You might have played with the technology a couple of years ago, only to find the extra infrastructure requirements were painful to implement and poorly documented. This probably left a bitter taste in your mouth, especially when things went wrong.
Feb. 2, 2016 04:30 AM EST Reads: 886