|By Java News Desk||
|October 7, 2004 12:00 AM EDT||
The trial in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York in Rochester involving Eastman Kodak Co and Sun Microsystems will no longer be entering its penalty phase, as it was otherwise expected it would today. The parties agreed instead this morning to an out-of-court settlement, under which Sun has agreed to pay Kodak $92 million for a license with respect to the three US patents Java has been found to breach..
Accordingly, Judge Michael Telesca has signed an order formally dismissing the case - "with prejudice."
It was just last Friday that a federal jury ruled in favor of Kodak in its dispute over Java, in which it alleged that the middleware mechanisms provided by Sun Microsystems' world-beating language in fact infringe patents Kodak acquired from Wang Laboratories Inc. in 1997.
At the time of the jury verdict, a spokesman for Kodak said: "Kodak has and continues to make substantial technology investments to ensure high-quality products. We are pleased that the court has validated Kodak's intellectual property rights protecting these valuable innovations."
Now, despite having argued throughout the 3-week trial that Java did not infringe on the Kodak patents and that, even if it did, the patents were invalid, Sun has evidently decided that a speedy settlement is imore aligned with its - and Java's - interests than further days in court. For the $92 million Sun receives a license and can declare 'business as usual' in Javaland.
In pre-trial documents Eastman Kodak Co lawyers had indicated that in the penalty phase the company would be asking for $1.06 billion in lump-sum royalties - a figure that represents half of Sun's operating profit from the sales of computer servers and storage equipment between January 1998 and June 2001. So $92 million is quite a bargain, many will doubtless argue.
By dismissing the case "with prejudice," Judge Telesca is indicating that the door is closed to Eastman Kodak Co. filing suit elsewhere in this matter. To do so would risk its infringement claim being dismissed completely. In the court docket Telesca also stated that the US District Court would be making sure that the terms of the agreement were properly implemented.
The cash settlement brings to an end a high-profile situation which has caused an outcry about the possible inadvisability of computer software being subject to US patent law, on the basis that perhaps copyright and trademarks are enough.
Graphic: Richard Silverberg (email@example.com) SYS-CON Media
Sun's president and COO, Jonathan I. Schwartz, who is on record recently as saying that he believes passionately in patents, told the Associated Press this afternoon: "We are eager to put this punitive litigation behind us."
Sun appears ultimately to share Schwartz's passion, then, and has today shown itself to be willing to invest $92 million of its substantial cash war chest in proving it.
|amn0n 10/08/04 01:19:24 AM EDT|
Even if Kodak had gained nothing on this stunt, their mere wielding of the software patent weapon in public constitutes a threat to the economic safety of almost anyone. It would be like the arsonist getting away with it just because he was unable to "sell" any insurances, and later failed to demonstrate the need for one. Is blackmailing ok just because the victim doesn't get to pay exactly the amount asked for initially?
|Dallas Chamber 10/07/04 07:08:50 PM EDT|
It's all happening for Sun, huh. Scott McNealy said only yesterday in Dallas: "People have been calling us irrelevant, dead, a zombie, a takeover target, not worth taking over. We've been insulted about every way you can imagine. All of sudden, we are relevant, we're growing, making money, gaining share."
|MapQuest 10/07/04 07:05:41 PM EDT|
peeyushc I don't want to disillusion you but IBM is headquartered in Armonk not Rochester. The NY bit is right tho ;-)
|peeyushc 10/07/04 07:03:33 PM EDT|
This should put a stop to IBM asking Sun to release Java...incidentally, Eastman Kodak Co and IBM are both from Rochester NY.
Feb. 19, 2017 08:00 PM EST Reads: 2,658
Feb. 19, 2017 06:45 PM EST Reads: 2,992
Feb. 19, 2017 06:15 PM EST Reads: 935
Feb. 19, 2017 06:00 PM EST Reads: 1,244
Feb. 19, 2017 05:45 PM EST Reads: 787
Feb. 19, 2017 05:00 PM EST Reads: 8,000
Feb. 19, 2017 05:00 PM EST Reads: 1,461
Feb. 19, 2017 05:00 PM EST Reads: 7,895
Feb. 19, 2017 05:00 PM EST Reads: 771
Feb. 19, 2017 04:15 PM EST Reads: 1,937
Feb. 19, 2017 02:30 PM EST Reads: 1,062
Feb. 19, 2017 02:00 PM EST Reads: 897
Feb. 19, 2017 01:15 PM EST Reads: 736
Feb. 19, 2017 12:45 PM EST Reads: 1,008
Feb. 19, 2017 11:45 AM EST Reads: 986
Feb. 19, 2017 11:30 AM EST Reads: 880
Feb. 19, 2017 11:15 AM EST Reads: 1,686
Feb. 19, 2017 11:15 AM EST Reads: 1,604
Feb. 19, 2017 11:00 AM EST Reads: 1,571
Feb. 19, 2017 10:45 AM EST Reads: 7,676