|By Jeremy Geelan||
|February 18, 2004 12:00 AM EST||
"The world has gone crazy with XML and then Web services," writes Sun's senior IT architect Victoria Livschitz, in an article currently to be found on the official Sun Web site.
"SOAP and UDDI are getting enormous attention," she continues, "and yet, from a software engineering standpoint, they seem to me a setback rather then a step forward. We now have a generation of young programmers who think of software in terms of square brackets. An enormous mess of XML documents that are now being created by enterprises at an alarming rate will be haunting our industry for decades. With all that excitement, no one seems to have the slightest interest in basic computer science."
Great sound bite. Now what about the reality?
Standards activist Rick Jelliffe, CTO of Topologi in Australia, comments:
'I don't think [Livschitz] has twigged that XML, raised as a side-issue at the end of the article, could be helpful for the kind of problem she complains about earlier on - 'subroutines, functions, data structures, loops, and other totally abstract constructs that neglect -- no, numb -- human intuition.' XML can allow a more human-friendly representation of things: a dog has three legs or whatever."
Microsoft's Dare Obasanjo, writing in the influential XML-DEV mailing list, writes: "Interesting."
"Too bad her comment is the equivalent of a sound bite with no substance at all," Obansajo (who works for Microsoft) continues. " I'd be curious to know why she thinks moving to XML from proprietary binary formats is a setback as opposed to a step forward. Maybe this is just Sun's way of justifying pushing replacing the XML in XML Web Services with ASN.1."
The last word though goes to XML expert Bob Wyman, who on the same list writes:
"From a 'computer science' point of view, you simply can't dispute what Livschitz has said. XML, etc. are a setback. But, she is wrong, I think, in her implicit equating of 'software engineering' with 'computer science.'
The strengths of XML, etc. are not in computer science. Rather, XML's strengths are in the human sciences of sociology, psychology, and political science. XML offers us no concepts or methods that weren't completely understood 'computer science' long before ASN.1 was first implemented in the early 80's. From a 'computer science' point of view, XML is less efficient, less expressive, etc. than ASN.1 binary encodings or the encodings of many other systems. However, because XML uses human readable tag names, because it is text based, easy to write, has an army of evangelists dedicated to it and many freely available tools for processing it, etc. XML wins in any system that values the needs of humans more than those of the machines.
XML's ability to 'win' in the human arena has enabled a great outburst of computer science as a result of the greater interchange of information and the increased ease of interchange. However, this great outpouring of utility and enablement of new computer science work has been at the cost of accepting an interchange format which is 'inferior' from the point of computer science. Of course, I think most of us accept that this cost is an acceptable one and a small price to pay in most cases.
Personally, I have always felt quite strongly that software engineering should be distinguished from computer science by recognizing that software engineering encompasses far more than the close technical scope of computer science. Where computer science is focused on algorithms and machine processes, the focus of software engineering should be on the development and deployment of software within and for systems that have human purposes as their goals. A computer scientist can, and should, focus only on the bits in the machine, a software engineer needs to consider not only the machine but also the organizational dynamics of the team that builds the software as well as the human needs of the organization that uses the software. A computer scientist couldn't help prefering ASN.1 binary encodings to XML. A software engineer, on the other hand, will often see no reasonable alternative to XML in today's world.
Virtually any argument that attempts to claim a technical superiority for XML is bound to be proved wrong by reference to ASN.1 or many other alternatives. In much the same way, most arguments that XML should 'simply be replaced' with a technically superior alternative simply expose the naiveté, ignorance, or closed-mindedness of their advocate. What is 'right' in computer science is not always what is 'right' in software engineering.
Of course, many people who read this will be wondering at this point why I, a "known" proponent of the use of ASN.1 and its encodings, am writing in defense of XML! Well, I'm not really. XML has its place and ASN.1 also has its place. XML is best used in applications where the influence of the human needs on design decisions is strongest while ASN.1 offers real value in applications where the needs of the machines dominate.
For instance, at PubSub.com, where we do content-based publish/subscribe, we speak to the outside world via HTML and XML since that is the 'language' that is most commonly understood by the world at large and the easiest format for people to generate and consume. On the other hand, all of our internal processing is done on ASN.1 binary encodings. (i.e. we convert everything to/from XML at our perimeter). The result is that we have great interoperability with the outside world by using XML and we've got great efficiency in our internal processing by using ASN.1 encodings. The best of both worlds. In the future, we will undoubtedly allow and even encourage some high volume publishers to send us data using ASN.1 encodings so that we can optimize a bit and eliminate some of the cost of translations at the perimeter -- however, I can't imagine that we would ever stop interchanging XML with the vast majority of our clients.
At the perimeter of PubSub.com's system, the human sciences and human needs dominate. In our core, it is the needs of our machines that dominate. Thus, we meld the application of software engineering and computer science.
Livschitz is right in saying that XML is a step backwards from the point of view of computer science. She is wrong in suggesting that it is anything but a tremendous step forward in software engineering."
|David Webber 02/20/04 12:02:32 AM EST|
Mike Plusch makes the case for ConciseXML, and there are other tools besides that offer different solution paths.
I''d urge people looking for ways to deploy user facing interfaces that make it much easier to grok XML to look at using VisualScript XML as a means to do that.
You''ll find more information on this at http://www.visualscript.com
and some interesting examples that can give you ideas around how you can use this at:
|Mike Plusch 02/19/04 09:08:47 PM EST|
If you are interested in an XML-compatible syntax
The specification is completely free and open, and parser implementations are also encouraged to be open source.
I am the co-creator of ConciseXML and would love to
|Thomas Cox 02/19/04 10:54:37 AM EST|
I''ve spent the last two years working with XML on a full-time basis, writing an applicataion to extract data from any arbitrary XML file. I''ve seen thousands of unique customer and third-party XML documents in that time.
From that perspective, I have to agree with Livschitz. Over 90% of the documents and associated DTDs or XSDs (if any) I see are a disaster. Of course, that''s not the directly the fault of XML, but XML does have some serious flaws (some pointed out by previous posters to this forum) that contribute to the mess. Not that XML doesn''t have many useful applications - RSS is one - but it is ill suited for many others, particularly when the data volume and/or data complexity is high.
I was particularly annoyed by Wyman''s specious contrast between "computer science" and "software engineering". Bad data structures - the problem underlying almost all bad XML - aren''t any more readable to humans than computers.
Further, if you care about scalability, performance, security, or data integrity then you should definitely pay more attention to computer science than Wyman''s fuzzy ideas about what SE should be. (FWIW, there''s already a discipline referred to as "Human Factors" or "Usability". It''s critical to good applications, but it doesn''t - and *shouldn''t* - usually deal with low-level constructs like data-interchange formats.)
Again, XML has its uses, but it is abused far more often than not.
|googler 02/19/04 06:11:35 AM EST|
She's probably trying to introduce ASN.1 into the non-tech world, in the same breath as XML (which people have head of and are interested in) so that people think Sun invented it. Sun One , ASN One.
It sounds like the kind of whining you got when VHS triumphed over Betamax. Live with it, move on or become irrelevant.
|Olderthan Sixteen 02/19/04 05:35:25 AM EST|
It is quite evident that XML is useful for many practical task. However, many people are finding that it is enough to say "XML solves this" to be viewed as visionaries. The result is that there is no meaningful discussion on the shortcomings and all we get is hype, hype, hype. The result is a very widespread misuse of XML.
In the article, there is a claim that XML is better than ASN.1. But in the field, architects have to deal with people claiming that XML is better than RDBMS, that it is easier to program with XQUERY than with container managed EJBs, that there is no more a need for RAD tools and other such nonsense. All of this is achieved magically by something called "XML". This is the real problem which is taking computer engineering, not just computer science, a step backwards.
It is not really a failing of XML as such, it is just lack of knowledge, which finds food in XML hype. Poeple not involved in technology just cannot tell the difference, as everything from Web Services, SOAP, XML databases, XPath, XSLT, etc. ... gets called XML. And then when someone complains that this is leading to nowhere, they come up with a comparison of XML and ASN.1 !!! Please, let's have some sanity.
|David Webber 02/18/04 11:46:09 PM EST|
Mike Plusch's example of boolean is exactly on the mark.
Head over to the OASIS CAM TC site and see how using CAM on top of schema goes after solving all this morass for you!
will get you a bunch of information on using CAM.
|Mike Plusch 02/18/04 11:04:14 PM EST|
XML is a step backwards as far as data representation goes.
Yes, I know that this is against conventional wisdom
|David Webber 02/18/04 10:03:44 PM EST|
I am focusing in on the morass of unmaintainable XML that is being created. This is a sad fact, and because noone is listening and learning the lessons of EDI before. To ameloriate this headlong rush to chaos, the OASIS CAM TC has created a system and the jCAM implementation to allow rigorous and consistent XML transactions and scripts to be assembled.
People should heed the message that Livschitz is delivering, and look to build better XML as a result by using techniques such as OASIS CAM is teaching.
DW, Chair OASIS CAM TC
|Cameron Roe 02/18/04 11:55:24 AM EST|
The ''real truth'' is that communicating to machines is hard. XML is, to my mind, an attempt to produce the ''Esparanto'' of machine to machine communication. It''s a fine notion but it loses something in the translation (pun intended).
|Wilfred Springer 02/18/04 10:43:11 AM EST|
> those of us who actually do this in the real world know the truth of the usefulness of XML and Web Services.
Hmmmmm, I wonder if a lot of people *really* know the truth about the usefulness of XML and Web Services. If that were true, then you would not expect seeing so many people embracing it as a general-purpose tool. This is (part of ) the truth:
There is no mutual agreement on how to do transactions across vendors. (ACID, or AC(I)D)
Just a couple of things that don't exist in the Web Services space. Sure, we have loads of specifications, but these specifications are sometimes only interesting from a theoritical perspective. Web Services will become truly interesting once all vendors agree on an integrated Web Services stack providing mechanisms to support reliability and transaction management.
Fortunately, we have JSR 208. Somewhere in the future, I will be able to deploy my services without really caring too much about the protocols. I will be able to leave that to the responsibility of the service providers; that will allow me to bind my service to ASN.1, ebMS, WS-I, REST, or what else is out there.
|Heywood Jablome 02/18/04 09:50:33 AM EST|
Such is the difference between theory and practice. Theorists, such as Livschitz, can pontificate all they want to puff up their pet beliefs but those of us who actually do this in the real world know the truth of the usefulness of XML and Web Services.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
Nov. 26, 2014 08:30 AM EST
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
Nov. 26, 2014 08:30 AM EST Reads: 202
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Nov. 26, 2014 08:30 AM EST Reads: 227
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Nov. 25, 2014 09:30 PM EST Reads: 1,087
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
Nov. 25, 2014 09:30 PM EST Reads: 1,119
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Nov. 25, 2014 08:00 PM EST Reads: 1,349
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Nov. 25, 2014 07:00 PM EST Reads: 1,200
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
Nov. 25, 2014 04:30 PM EST Reads: 1,235
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Nov. 24, 2014 07:00 PM EST Reads: 1,581
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
Nov. 24, 2014 12:00 PM EST Reads: 1,457
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Nov. 24, 2014 11:00 AM EST Reads: 1,591
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
Nov. 24, 2014 09:00 AM EST Reads: 1,606
SYS-CON Events announced today that Windstream, a leading provider of advanced network and cloud communications, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9–11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), a FORTUNE 500 and S&P 500 company, is a leading provider of advanced network communications, including cloud computing and managed services, to businesses nationwide. The company also offers broadband, phone and digital TV services to consumers primarily in rural areas.
Nov. 23, 2014 07:30 PM EST Reads: 1,795
"There is a natural synchronization between the business models, the IoT is there to support ,” explained Brendan O'Brien, Co-founder and Chief Architect of Aria Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at the 15th International Cloud Expo®, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Nov. 23, 2014 12:00 PM EST Reads: 1,735
The major cloud platforms defy a simple, side-by-side analysis. Each of the major IaaS public-cloud platforms offers their own unique strengths and functionality. Options for on-site private cloud are diverse as well, and must be designed and deployed while taking existing legacy architecture and infrastructure into account. Then the reality is that most enterprises are embarking on a hybrid cloud strategy and programs. In this Power Panel at 15th Cloud Expo (http://www.CloudComputingExpo.com), moderated by Ashar Baig, Research Director, Cloud, at Gigaom Research, Nate Gordon, Director of T...
Nov. 23, 2014 07:45 AM EST Reads: 1,751
ARMONK, N.Y., Nov. 20, 2014 /PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced that it is bringing a greater level of control, security and flexibility to cloud-based application development and delivery with a single-tenant version of Bluemix, IBM's platform-as-a-service. The new platform enables developers to build ap...
Nov. 22, 2014 05:30 PM EST Reads: 1,553
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
Nov. 22, 2014 05:30 PM EST Reads: 1,498
Technology is enabling a new approach to collecting and using data. This approach, commonly referred to as the "Internet of Things" (IoT), enables businesses to use real-time data from all sorts of things including machines, devices and sensors to make better decisions, improve customer service, and lower the risk in the creation of new revenue opportunities. In his General Session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Dave Wagstaff, Vice President and Chief Architect at BSQUARE Corporation, discuss the real benefits to focus on, how to understand the requirements of a successful solution, the flow of ...
Nov. 21, 2014 08:00 PM EST Reads: 1,558
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
Nov. 21, 2014 08:00 PM EST Reads: 1,482
"BSQUARE is in the business of selling software solutions for smart connected devices. It's obvious that IoT has moved from being a technology to being a fundamental part of business, and in the last 18 months people have said let's figure out how to do it and let's put some focus on it, " explained Dave Wagstaff, VP & Chief Architect, at BSQUARE Corporation, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4-6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Nov. 21, 2014 07:00 PM EST Reads: 1,417