|By Jeremy Geelan||
|February 25, 2007 12:30 PM EST||
Jeremy Geelan's i-Technology Blog: Blogging – Corporate America's "Big Wet Kiss To Web 2.0"
The 25,000+ people who were kind enough to read, and interact with, my 2005 essay "Are We Blogging Each Other to Death?" may not have seen it yet, but they will at some point, for sure. I refer to the report issued by Gartner that 200 million people already have given up blogging and that the total number of bloggers will peak during the first half of this year at around 100 million, causing John R. Patrick to ask rhetorically whether Spring 2007 truly is The Peak of Blogging?
Patrick, ever the contrary indicator, contends that it isn't the peak of blogging at all: "Blogging," he exclaims, "is just beginning!"
But it is the discussion which follows that interests me, because the significance of blogging is not the word 'blog' whether used as a verb or a noun, but its role as a harbinger of the game-changing Web-as-platform revolution. In particular, the migration of blogging from the individual toward the enterprise represents a massive validation of those like Professor Andy McAfee who argue that Enterprise Web 2.0 is already a reality...whether or not Wikipedia readily accepted the fact.
Put crudely: by embracing blogging, corporate America gave a big wet kiss to Web 2.0 (if you prefer Dale Dougherty's handy term). To the "New Web" (if you prefer a somewhat simpler term, and one that no one owns).
The part of the Gartner report that made me think of my earlier Are We Blogging Each Other To Death? thoughts was the bit about how less than 2% of all Internet users are frequent contributors to content on the web. This is the kind of statistic that always exercises those of us actually involved with building Web-based applications, because it's a classic full-glass/empty-glass situation: do we rejoice at the fact that 98% of the marketplace may yet come round, or bemoan that only 2% have seen the light?
Since I already mentioned Wikipedia, how about that? According to the John Musser/Tim O'Reilly report "Web 2.0 Principles and Best Practices" it's known what percentage of the registered Wikipedia users are contributors: around 7%. If you view, as I for example do, Wikipedia as an application rather than as a destination site, then that means that 70,000 people or more are actively using it. That's a lot of users for a fairly sophisticated app. Kudos to EMC's Cornelia Davis for nailing one very simple way of realizing how significant a number:
"that is more than twice the number of people working for my employer (EMC has around 31,000 employees)"So the challenge for Enterprise Web 2.0 is to achieve the same kind of buy-in that already exists out there on the New Web. Because unless a company has the same kind of percentage of its intranet users actively contributing content, my contention is that it will swiftly be overtaken by those companies that do. Small wonder then that Sam Palmisamo (who famously has his own avatar) is rumored to have enjoined his fellow IBM execs to participate in Second Life. He is probably interested in seeing whether the 7% figure operates there, too: if it did, there would be over 25,000 Big Blue avatars by the end of this year!
As for the wider New Web itself, a 7% participation rate in any one application on a global scale would, beyond a shadow of a doubt, be the foundation of the next Microsoft. Total internet users are estimated at 1.1 billion , so the 100 million people who blog (if we go by Gartner's figures) takes us far above the 7% mark (77 million). But no one company owns blogging, any more than any one company owns Web mail, or Instant Messaging, or photo sharing.
What kind of app is missing, from the New Web landscape? What kind of app would attract 77 million users? One that adheres to all the tried and true principles of first-rate co-technology (my turn to coin a term now), plus adds functionalities and leverages emergent methodologies like automatic semantic video tagging, audio search, and social bookmarking. Above all, one that solves a problem not already being solved; or solves one already being solved, but ten times better.
("100% Spam Free E-mail" would be one obvious example of the latter; "Google for Memories" would be a less obvious example of the former.)
For those many Webpreneurs and innovators who believe they're on to exactly that, I say only this. Stay with it! The i-Technology world can do way, way better than blogging. I just know it!!
|Sasha 02/27/07 02:36:16 AM EST|
>> What kind of app is missing, from the New Web landscape?
We think the answer is - Web Presentation tool. Most blogs are composed of text and some images. Blogs need a web tool for better story-telling. Also, it's important to aggregate the content from the Web. And that's what we do - www.spresent.com (shameless plug)
If blogs do well at Corporate space - it would open doors for other Web 2.0 apps and that would be an exciting time.
|Pranam Kolari 02/25/07 03:08:00 PM EST|
We reported some updates on spam in the indexed blogosphere as seen at a ping server.
Here are some highlights --
> 53% of all pings is spam, 64% of all pings from blogs in English is spam. > 56% of all pinging blogs are spam. > 51% of pinging Blogspot blogs are spam. > Myspace is easily the primary contributor to the Blogosphere > Most spam blogs are still hosted in the US. > 99.75% of blogs on .info domain are spam. > High PPC contexts remain the primary motivation to spam.
See our blog post for additional information. Here's the link: http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2007/02/01/pings-spings-splogs-and-the-...
Jun. 24, 2016 04:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,040
Jun. 24, 2016 02:15 PM EDT Reads: 314
Jun. 24, 2016 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,280
Jun. 24, 2016 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,525
Jun. 24, 2016 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 685
Jun. 24, 2016 11:15 AM EDT Reads: 559
Jun. 24, 2016 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 915
Jun. 24, 2016 10:30 AM EDT Reads: 833
Jun. 24, 2016 09:45 AM EDT Reads: 1,136
Jun. 24, 2016 09:30 AM EDT Reads: 1,089
Jun. 24, 2016 09:30 AM EDT Reads: 558
Jun. 24, 2016 08:45 AM EDT Reads: 1,183
Jun. 24, 2016 08:45 AM EDT Reads: 1,088
Jun. 24, 2016 08:30 AM EDT Reads: 749
Jun. 24, 2016 08:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,389
Jun. 24, 2016 08:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,166
Jun. 24, 2016 07:30 AM EDT Reads: 940
Jun. 24, 2016 07:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,136
Jun. 22, 2016 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,328
Jun. 19, 2016 12:45 PM EDT Reads: 1,217