|By Shelly Palmer||
|February 25, 2013 04:42 PM EST||
Draper reported on a Republican-conducted focus group session in which a researcher asked what younger swing voters associated with the word “Republican.” When the facilitator wrote the word “Republican” on a whiteboard,
… the outburst was immediate and vehement: “Corporate greed.” “Old.” “Middle-aged white men.” “Rich.” “Religious.” “Conservative.” “Hypocritical.” “Military retirees.” “Narrow-minded.” “Rigid.” “Not progressive.” “Polarizing.” “Stuck in their ways.” “Farmers.”
Except for “Military retirees,” “Farmers,” and, perhaps, “Religious,” the focus group could have been talking about legacy media top management, especially the comment about “Stuck in their ways.”
And there is no better example of being “stuck in their ways” than the legacy media way of compensating salespeople, primarily on commission.
As Daniel Pink suggests in his best-selling new book, To Sell Is Human and in his Harvard Business Review article “A Radical Prescription For Sales,” “the reps of the future won’t work on commission.”
What if paying salespeople commissions is rooted more in tradition than logic? What if it’s a practice so cemented into orthodoxy that it’s no longer an actual decision? That’s what a handful of companies have begun discovering. To the surprise of many, these firms are showing that commissions can sometimes do more harm than good—and that getting rid of them can open a path to higher profits.
We know that most legacy media CEOs care about only two things: One, compensating themselves an undeserved, gargantuan amount of money, and, two, higher profits every year.
Don’t these CEOs read? Can they read? That’s a legitimate question, because either they don’t read (or can’t) or they do read about but don’t pay attention to the latest trends in compensation and often make their salespeople perform worse than they otherwise would by paying them the wrong kind of commissions. For example, using yield management programs to determine optimal rates and then paying salespeople commissions based on getting the computer-generated higher rates.
The assumptions management makes are: One, that all salespeople are motivated solely by money, and, two, that salespeople have control over the rates advertisers will pay.
Clearly legacy media managers are motivated by money, so they assume everyone else is. Plus, their bonuses are based on higher profits every year, so they assume all of their salespeople are interested in helping them receive a higher bonus. Wrong, arrogant, and stupid.
But stupid is as stupid does; even Forrest Gump knew that. And that’s what paying salespeople primarily on commission does – makes them stupid. Makes them hunters. And what do hunters do? They kill and eat their prey.
Commissions, especially commissions based on higher rates or higher shares, force salespeople to treat their customers as prey.
But do you think the new media companies such as Google or Facebook, or companies such as Amazon or Apple consider their customers prey? Of course not. Their primary business strategy is to delight their customers, not kill them. Their salespeople are educators who, to use Daniel Pink’s term, upserve their customers, not upsell them.
Yes, legacy media top managers are stuck in their ways, particularly when it comes to compensating salespeople, and they can’t be unstuck from obsolescence any more than the Republicans can.
May. 1, 2016 01:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,722
May. 1, 2016 12:45 PM EDT Reads: 759
May. 1, 2016 12:15 PM EDT Reads: 2,310
May. 1, 2016 12:00 PM EDT Reads: 1,103
May. 1, 2016 11:45 AM EDT Reads: 1,480
May. 1, 2016 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 814
May. 1, 2016 11:00 AM EDT Reads: 1,083
May. 1, 2016 10:15 AM EDT Reads: 1,149
May. 1, 2016 09:45 AM EDT Reads: 977
May. 1, 2016 09:45 AM EDT Reads: 911
May. 1, 2016 07:30 AM EDT Reads: 946
May. 1, 2016 07:00 AM EDT Reads: 820
May. 1, 2016 06:30 AM EDT Reads: 2,485
Apr. 30, 2016 04:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,686
Apr. 30, 2016 02:30 PM EDT Reads: 1,723
Apr. 30, 2016 02:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,462
Apr. 30, 2016 01:15 PM EDT Reads: 686
Apr. 30, 2016 01:15 PM EDT Reads: 1,541
Apr. 30, 2016 11:15 AM EDT Reads: 897
Apr. 30, 2016 10:00 AM EDT Reads: 765