Welcome!

Web 2.0 Authors: Victoria Livschitz, Lori MacVittie, Pat Romanski, Liz McMillan, Larry Dragich

News Feed Item

US Airways Reports Record December Load Factor

TEMPE, Ariz., Jan. 4, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- US Airways Group, Inc. (NYSE: LCC) today announced December, fourth quarter and full-year 2012 traffic results. Mainline revenue passenger miles (RPMs) for the month were 5.0 billion, up 1.3 percent versus December 2011. Mainline capacity was 6.0 billion available seat miles (ASMs), down 0.2 percent versus December 2011. Mainline passenger load factor was a record 83.1 percent for the month of December, up 1.2 points versus December 2011.

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20120103/LA28814LOGO)

US Airways' President Scott Kirby said, "Our December consolidated (mainline and Express) passenger revenue per available seat mile (PRASM) increased approximately four percent versus the same period last year. I would like to thank and congratulate our team of 32,000 employees for doing an outstanding job of taking care of our customers in 2012 while setting numerous operating records, including on-time departures and arrivals, completion factor, and baggage handling. We look forward to continuing this trend into the New Year and beyond."

As reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation, US Airways' preliminary on-time performance was 82.8 percent for the month of December with a completion factor of 99.3 percent. 

The following summarizes US Airways Group's traffic results for the month, fourth quarter and full-year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, consisting of mainline-operated flights as well as US Airways Express flights operated by wholly owned subsidiaries PSA Airlines and Piedmont Airlines.

US Airways Mainline









DECEMBER





2012

2011

Change








Mainline Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

3,888,164

3,801,130

2.3

%


Atlantic

651,000

695,605

(6.4)

%


Latin

433,241

413,144

4.9

%


Total Mainline Revenue Passenger Miles

4,972,405

4,909,879

1.3

%







Mainline Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic

4,588,632

4,561,746

0.6

%


Atlantic

849,255

918,754

(7.6)

%


Latin

547,321

515,494

6.2

%


Total Mainline Available Seat Miles

5,985,208

5,995,994

(0.2)

%







Mainline Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

84.7

83.3

1.4

pts


Atlantic

76.7

75.7

1.0

pts


Latin

79.2

80.1

(0.9)

pts


Total Mainline Load Factor

83.1

81.9

1.2

pts







Mainline Enplanements






Domestic

3,931,176

3,896,288

0.9

%


Atlantic

159,445

171,417

(7.0)

%


Latin

311,372

304,397

2.3

%


Total Mainline Enplanements

4,401,993

4,372,102

0.7

%













QUARTER TO DATE  







2012

2011

Change








Mainline Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

11,620,687

11,114,145

4.6

%


Atlantic

2,164,499

2,296,835

(5.8)

%


Latin

1,087,117

1,067,347

1.9

%


Total Mainline Revenue Passenger Miles

14,872,303

14,478,327

2.7

%







Mainline Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic

13,415,715

13,126,185

2.2

%


Atlantic

2,777,855

2,969,489

(6.5)

%


Latin

1,352,462

1,323,028

2.2

%


Total Mainline Available Seat Miles

17,546,032

17,418,702

0.7

%







Mainline Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

86.6

84.7

1.9

pts


Atlantic

77.9

77.3

0.6

pts


Latin

80.4

80.7

(0.3)

pts


Total Mainline Load Factor

84.8

83.1

1.7

pts







Mainline Enplanements






Domestic

12,027,673

11,779,280

2.1

%


Atlantic

533,680

566,907

(5.9)

%


Latin

789,228

789,907

(0.1)

%


Total Mainline Enplanements

13,350,581

13,136,094

1.6

%













YEAR TO DATE







2012

2011

Change








Mainline Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

46,662,335

45,087,640

3.5

%


Atlantic

10,741,122

10,792,122

(0.5)

%


Latin

5,032,878

4,899,106

2.7

%


Total Mainline Revenue Passenger Miles

62,436,335

60,778,868

2.7

%







Mainline Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic

54,508,319

53,155,839

2.5

%


Atlantic

13,604,210

13,453,752

1.1

%


Latin

6,098,560

5,993,474

1.8

%


Total Mainline Available Seat Miles

74,211,089

72,603,065

2.2

%







Mainline Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

85.6

84.8

0.8

pts


Atlantic

79.0

80.2

(1.2)

pts


Latin

82.5

81.7

0.8

pts


Total Mainline Load Factor

84.1

83.7

0.4

pts







Mainline Enplanements






Domestic

47,928,705

46,656,489

2.7

%


Atlantic

2,643,706

2,663,244

(0.7)

%


Latin

3,705,464

3,639,075

1.8

%


Total Mainline Enplanements

54,277,875

52,958,808

2.5

%













Notes:  





1)

Canada, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands are included in the domestic results.

2)

Latin numbers include the Caribbean.







 

US Airways Express (Piedmont Airlines, PSA Airlines)









DECEMBER





2012

2011

Change








Express Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

209,664

181,696

15.4

%







Express Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic 

279,142

255,682

9.2

%







Express Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

75.1

71.1

4.0

pts







Express Enplanements






Domestic

690,830

634,160

8.9

%













QUARTER TO DATE







2012

2011

Change








Express Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

641,080

572,758

11.9

%







Express Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic 

831,189

773,879

7.4

%







Express Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

77.1

74.0

3.1

pts







Express Enplanements






Domestic 

2,127,243

1,985,558

7.1

%













YEAR TO DATE







2012

2011

Change








Express Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

2,444,111

2,298,451

6.3

%







Express Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic 

3,299,122

3,152,186

4.7

%







Express Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

74.1

72.9

1.2

pts







Express Enplanements






Domestic 

8,246,941

7,895,309

4.5

%













Notes:  





1)

Canada is included in domestic results.





    

Consolidated US Airways Group, Inc.









DECEMBER





2012

2011

Change








Consolidated Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

4,097,828

3,982,826

2.9

%


Atlantic

651,000

695,605

(6.4)

%


Latin

433,241

413,144

4.9

%


Total Consolidated Revenue Passenger Miles

5,182,069

5,091,575

1.8

%







Consolidated Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic

4,867,774

4,817,428

1.0

%


Atlantic

849,255

918,754

(7.6)

%


Latin

547,321

515,494

6.2

%


Total Consolidated Available Seat Miles

6,264,350

6,251,676

0.2

%







Consolidated Load Factor (%)






Domestic

84.2

82.7

1.5

pts


Atlantic

76.7

75.7

1.0

pts


Latin

79.2

80.1

(0.9)

pts


Total Consolidated Load Factor

82.7

81.4

1.3

pts







Consolidated Enplanements






Domestic

4,622,006

4,530,448

2.0

%


Atlantic

159,445

171,417

(7.0)

%


Latin

311,372

304,397

2.3

%


Total Consolidated Enplanements

5,092,823

5,006,262

1.7

%













QUARTER TO DATE  







2012

2011

Change








Consolidated Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

12,261,767

11,686,903

4.9

%


Atlantic

2,164,499

2,296,835

(5.8)

%


Latin

1,087,117

1,067,347

1.9

%


Total Consolidated Revenue Passenger Miles

15,513,383

15,051,085

3.1

%







Consolidated Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic

14,246,904

13,900,064

2.5

%


Atlantic

2,777,855

2,969,489

(6.5)

%


Latin

1,352,462

1,323,028

2.2

%


Total Consolidated Available Seat Miles

18,377,221

18,192,581

1.0

%







Consolidated Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

86.1

84.1

2.0

pts


Atlantic

77.9

77.3

0.6

pts


Latin

80.4

80.7

(0.3)

pts


Total Consolidated Load Factor

84.4

82.7

1.7

pts







Consolidated Enplanements






Domestic

14,154,916

13,764,838

2.8

%


Atlantic

533,680

566,907

(5.9)

%


Latin

789,228

789,907

(0.1)

%


Total Consolidated Enplanements

15,477,824

15,121,652

2.4

%













YEAR TO DATE







2012

2011

Change








Consolidated Revenue Passenger Miles (000)






Domestic

49,106,446

47,386,091

3.6

%


Atlantic

10,741,122

10,792,122

(0.5)

%


Latin

5,032,878

4,899,106

2.7

%


Total Consolidated Revenue Passenger Miles

64,880,446

63,077,319

2.9

%







Consolidated Available Seat Miles (000)






Domestic

57,807,441

56,308,025

2.7

%


Atlantic

13,604,210

13,453,752

1.1

%


Latin

6,098,560

5,993,474

1.8

%


Total Consolidated Available Seat Miles

77,510,211

75,755,251

2.3

%







Consolidated Load Factor (%)






Domestic 

84.9

84.2

0.7

pts


Atlantic

79.0

80.2

(1.2)

pts


Latin

82.5

81.7

0.8

pts


Total Consolidated Load Factor

83.7

83.3

0.4

pts







Consolidated Enplanements






Domestic

56,175,646

54,551,798

3.0

%


Atlantic

2,643,706

2,663,244

(0.7)

%


Latin

3,705,464

3,639,075

1.8

%


Total Consolidated Enplanements

62,524,816

60,854,117

2.7

%













Notes:  





1)

Canada, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands are included in the domestic results.

2)

Latin numbers include the Caribbean.







US Airways

US Airways, along with US Airways Shuttle and US Airways Express, operates more than 3,000 flights per day and serves 195 communities in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Europe, the Middle East, the Caribbean, Central and South America. The airline employs more than 32,000 aviation professionals worldwide, operates the world's largest fleet of Airbus aircraft and is a member of the Star Alliance network, which offers its customers more than 21,900 daily flights to 1,329 airports in 194 countries. Together with its US Airways Express partners, the airline serves approximately 80 million passengers each year and operates hubs in Charlotte, N.C., Philadelphia and Phoenix, and a focus city in Washington, D.C. at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Aviation Week and Overhaul & Maintenance magazine presented US Airways with the 2012 Aviation Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) of the Year Award for demonstrating outstanding achievement and innovation in the area of technical operations. Military Times Edge magazine named US Airways as a Best of Vets employer in 2011 and 2012. US Airways was, for the third year in a row, the only airline included as one of the 50 best companies to work for in the U.S. by LATINA Style magazine's 50 Report. The airline also earned a 100 percent rating on the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality index for six consecutive years. The Corporate Equality index is a leading indicator of companies' attitudes and policies toward lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees and customers. For more company information visit usairways.com, follow on Twitter @USAirways or at Facebook.com/USAirways. (LCCT)

Forward Looking Statements

Certain of the statements contained or referred to herein are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "plan," "project," "could," "should," "would," "continue" and similar terms used in connection with statements regarding, among others, the outlook, expected fuel costs, revenue and pricing environment, and expected financial performance and liquidity position of the Company. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about future financial and operating results, the Company's plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of the Company's management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's actual results and financial position to differ materially from these statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following: the impact of significant operating losses in the future; downturns in economic conditions and their impact on passenger demand, booking practices and related revenues; the impact of the price and availability of fuel and significant disruptions in the supply of aircraft fuel; competitive practices in the industry, including the impact of industry consolidation; increased costs of financing, a reduction in the availability of financing and fluctuations in interest rates; the Company's high level of fixed obligations and ability to fund general corporate requirements, obtain additional financing and respond to competitive developments; any failure to comply with the liquidity covenants contained in financing arrangements; provisions in credit card processing and other commercial agreements that may affect the Company's liquidity; the impact of union disputes, employee strikes and other labor-related disruptions; the inability to maintain labor costs at competitive levels; interruptions or disruptions in service at one or more of the Company's hub airports or focus city; regulatory changes affecting the allocation of slots; the Company's reliance on third-party regional operators or third-party service providers; the Company's reliance on and costs, rights and functionality of third-party distribution channels, including those provided by global distribution systems, conventional travel agents and online travel agents; changes in government regulation; the impact of changes to the Company's business model the loss of key personnel or inability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the impact of conflicts overseas or terrorist attacks, and the impact of ongoing security concerns; the Company's ability to operate and grow its route network; the impact of environmental regulation; the Company's reliance on technology and automated systems and the impact of any failure or disruption of, or delay in, these technologies or systems; costs of ongoing data security compliance requirements and the impact of any significant data security breach; the impact of any accident involving the Company's aircraft or the aircraft of its regional operators; delays in scheduled aircraft deliveries or other loss of anticipated fleet capacity; the Company's dependence on a limited number of suppliers for aircraft, aircraft engines and parts; the Company's ability to operate profitably out of Philadelphia International Airport; the impact of weather conditions and seasonality of airline travel; the impact of possible future increases in insurance costs or reductions in available insurance coverage; the impact of global events that affect travel behavior, such as an outbreak of a contagious disease; the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; the Company's ability to use NOLs and certain other tax attributes; and other risks and uncertainties listed from time to time in the Company's reports to and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). There may be other factors not identified above of which the Company is not currently aware that may affect matters discussed in the forward-looking statements, and may also cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. The Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or supplement any forward-looking statement to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such estimates other than as required by law. Additional factors that may affect the future results of the Company are set forth in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in the Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and in the Company's other filings with the SEC, which are available at www.usairways.com.

SOURCE US Airways

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.