Welcome!

Agile Computing Authors: Pat Romanski, Liz McMillan, Sematext Blog, Elizabeth White, Kevin Benedict

News Feed Item

Stand Up For Democracy State Wide Coalition Analysis Of Proposed Emergency Manager Replacement Law Ignores The Will Of The Voters Who Rejected Old Law

Same law, different day is proposed by right-wing leadership in Lansing

DETROIT, Dec. 10, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The organizers of the statewide coalition Stand Up for Democracy continue to urge state leaders to respect the will of voters who resoundingly rejected PA 4 aka the emergency manager law with a new replacement law. An analysis of that law that is expected to pass in the lame duck session this week demonstrates it is clearly that the same as the one voters rejected.

The analysis was created by Nick Ciaramitaro, a lobbyist for Michigan AFSCME Council 25. The organization is one of the partners in the Stand Up for Democracy statewide coalition.

Senate Bill 865 (H-5) analysis

Senate Bill 865 (H-5) will likely be considered by both the House and the Senate Tuesday.  The bill re-enacts many of the worst provisions of PA 4, in effect negating much the decision made by the people of the State of Michigan.  Worse, the proponents of this bill (including Governor Snyder) are misrepresenting much of its contents expecting that most legislators will not read the actual language of the bill.  Here is what the bill does.  To demonstrate the lengths to which the Snyder Administration will go to mislead voters I have put the portions of the bill that are identical to PA 4 in red in a copy of this text on the Michigan AFSCME Council 25 website.

Title

Even the title of the bill belies the dishonesty of those who suggest that this is not re-enactment of PA 4.  In provides that this is a bill to (among other things):

  • "to provide for review, management, management, planning and control of financial operation of local units of government and school districts"
  • "to provide for the appointment and to prescribe the powers and duties of an emergency manager for a local unit of government or school district
  • "to provide for the modification or termination of contracts under certain circumstances"

The title also makes clear that the bill provides for an appropriation thereby nullifying the right of referendum.

­Section 1­

­The short title for the bill is the "local government and school district fiscal responsibility act"

Section 2

Definitions

Section 3

Legislation intent language virtually identical to PA 4

Section 4

Provisions for preliminary reviews by the "state financial authorities" same as in PA 4 ("state financial authorities defined in Section 2 as the State Treasurer for municipalities and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction) to determine "probable financial stress" under same criteria as PA 4 including "other facts or circumstances … in the treasurer's sole discretion for a municipal government  … or .. in the state treasurer's or superintendent of public instruction's sole discretion for a school district …"

There is a brief 5-day "response period" provided for local governments to react to interim reports before the issuance of the preliminary report that may be new.

If there is a preliminary finding of probable financial stress a review team is formed.  The composition and responsibilities of the review team are the same as PA 4 except that the review team is not empowered to negotiate a consent agreement at this point.  Actions of previous review teams under PA 4 are ratified.  In fact, all prior acts are ratified. 

There continues to be no requirement that review teams comply with either the Open Meetings Act or the Freedom of Information Act.

Section 5

The bill requires that the review team hold at least one public "information" meeting in the local jurisdiction.  There is no requirement that any comments be taken from the public. 

Most of the rest of the powers and responsibilities including reporting and appeal procedures are essentially the same as PA 4.  This includes findings of "structural" operating deficits (undefined) and open ended, unsubstantiated conclusion of things that may happen in the future. 

The major change is that the review team is restricted to one of only two findings:  there is or there is not a "financial emergency."  This point becomes more significant later as the new proposal does allow options as will be explained later.

Section 6

This section deals with the Governor's determination based on the report of the review team and the appeal process is essentially the same as PA 4 except the determination is limited to the question of whether or not a financial emergency exists.

Section 7

This section contains the major change from PA 4.  Rather than a fiscal emergency triggering receivership, it triggers 4 options:

  • a consent agreement
  • an emergency manager
  • a neutral evaluation process
  • Chapter 9 bankruptcy.

Each of these options is explained in detail in subsequent sections of the bill.  The local government must make up its mind with 7 days (and an elected mayor must join in the agreement if there is one) but the default if no decision is made locally is the neutral evaluation process.

Section 8

Provisions concerning a consent agreement are essentially the same with one major exception.  A default can lead to either an emergency manager or the neutral evaluation process at the choice of the State Treasurer.  It also adds the power to waive the suspension of PERA (which currently exists under PA 4) to the State Treasurer.

Section 9

This section governs the appointment of an emergency manager and is essentially unchanged from PA 4 except that a local government is given the authority to remove an emergency manager by a 2/3 vote after one year in office.  Such action may but is not required to result in the removal of the unit of government from receivership.  In addition, a local unit of government may petition the State Treasurer or the Governor to remove an emergency manager in the first year.  The State agrees to assume the salary (but not expenses or other costs) of the manager.  All existing emergency financial managers are grand parented in.

Section 10

This section reinstates the powers of an emergency manager essentially the same as under PA 4. 

Section 11

This section reinstates powers of an emergency manager essentially identical to PA 4. 

Section 12

Reenacts all of the onerous powers of an emergency manager as provided in PA 4 including contract abrogation, dissolution of communities, usurpation of powers of local officials and more.

Section 13

Reenacts provisions of PA 4 suspending wages and benefits of local elected officials during receivership.

Section 14

Reenacts powers of an Emergency Manager of a school district as provided in PA 4.

Section 15

Requires the approval of the State Treasurer to sell assets valued at more than $50,000.  Reenacts provisions of PA 4 protecting collective agreement provisions for payment of benefits upon the active duty death of a police officer or firefighter.

Section 16

Provides for referral of criminal matters to the Attorney General and local prosecutor as in PA 4.

Section 17

Reporting requirements of an Emergency Manager similar to PA 4.

Section 18

Provisions for an emergency manager to recommend Chapter 9 bankruptcy to the Governor and the State Treasurer.

Section 19

This section is one of the few "concessions" made to the demand of the people of the state of Michigan for local democracy and even here they mess it up. 

The section requires that before an emergency manager abrogates a collective bargaining agreement, borrows money or sells assets with a value in excess of $50,000, he/she shall submit the proposal to the local government.  The local government has 7 days to approve or disapprove the action.  If it does not act, the action is considered approved.  If it disapproves, it has 10 days to submit a fiscally equivalent option to the local emergency financial assistance loan board who then have 30 days to pick one.  The members of the local emergency financial assistance loan board are three members of the Governor's cabinet including and chaired by the State Treasurer. 

Section 20

Immunity and Attorney general responsibilities essentially the same as in PA 4.

Section 21

Two year carry over for budget and working conditions as in PA 4 and 1 year carryover of ordinances as in PA 4 from end of receivership.

Section 22

Allows the governor to impose "best practices" (undefined), a model charter or model charter provisions (undefined) and management training as a condition to the end of receivership. 

Section 23

Provides for an "advisory board" that excludes all local participation to continue state intervention as a transition from receivership at the option of the governor.  The board "advises" mostly its own members.  It does provide for open meetings act and freedom of information act application to this board. 

Section 24

Allows the governor to appoint a new emergency manager on his own initiative upon recommendation of the transition board provided for above.

Section 25

Provides for a neutral arbitration option similar to a successful provision in California law with a number of seemingly harsh provisions including:

  • receivership if the local unit of government fails to send notice to all interested parties within 7 days of picking the option;
  • the unfettered right of the State Treasurer to reject a settlement reached through the neutral arbitration process;
  • inability to extend the process beyond 90 days when both parties agree that such an extension is warranted.

Section 26

Provides for ability of a local unit of government file under Chapter 9 of the federal bankruptcy act with the consent of the Governor. 

Section 27

Reenacts provisions of PA 4 concerning suspension of collective bargaining rights under receivership.

Section 28

Identical limitations on new taxes as in PA 4.

Section 29

Bulletin and rule authority for the State Treasurer and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Section 30

Reaffirms all actions taken heretofore under PA 4 and 72.

Section 31

Grandparents all existing emergency managers and emergency financial managers

Section 32

Immunity for all state players.

Section 33

Severability

Section 34 and 35

Appropriations to prevent another referendum

Enacting section 1

Repeals PA 72.

Enacting section 2.

Legislative intent that this act is a successor statute to PA 4 and attempts to incorporate changes to other acts that only applied to PA 4. 

Facebook

SOURCE Stand Up for Democracy

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
IoT is rapidly changing the way enterprises are using data to improve business decision-making. In order to derive business value, organizations must unlock insights from the data gathered and then act on these. In their session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Hoffman, Vice President at EastBanc Technologies, and Peter Shashkin, Head of Development Department at EastBanc Technologies, discussed how one organization leveraged IoT, cloud technology and data analysis to improve customer experiences and effi...
The Internet of Things will challenge the status quo of how IT and development organizations operate. Or will it? Certainly the fog layer of IoT requires special insights about data ontology, security and transactional integrity. But the developmental challenges are the same: People, Process and Platform and how we integrate our thinking to solve complicated problems. In his session at 19th Cloud Expo, Craig Sproule, CEO of Metavine, will demonstrate how to move beyond today's coding paradigm ...
Internet of @ThingsExpo, taking place November 1-3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA, is co-located with the 19th International Cloud Expo and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world and ThingsExpo Silicon Valley Call for Papers is now open.
Big Data engines are powering a lot of service businesses right now. Data is collected from users from wearable technologies, web behaviors, purchase behavior as well as several arbitrary data points we’d never think of. The demand for faster and bigger engines to crunch and serve up the data to services is growing exponentially. You see a LOT of correlation between “Cloud” and “Big Data” but on Big Data and “Hybrid,” where hybrid hosting is the sanest approach to the Big Data Infrastructure pro...
"My role is working with customers, helping them go through this digital transformation. I spend a lot of time talking to banks, big industries, manufacturers working through how they are integrating and transforming their IT platforms and moving them forward," explained William Morrish, General Manager Product Sales at Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
A critical component of any IoT project is what to do with all the data being generated. This data needs to be captured, processed, structured, and stored in a way to facilitate different kinds of queries. Traditional data warehouse and analytical systems are mature technologies that can be used to handle certain kinds of queries, but they are not always well suited to many problems, particularly when there is a need for real-time insights.
With 15% of enterprises adopting a hybrid IT strategy, you need to set a plan to integrate hybrid cloud throughout your infrastructure. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Steven Dreher, Director of Solutions Architecture at Green House Data, discussed how to plan for shifting resource requirements, overcome challenges, and implement hybrid IT alongside your existing data center assets. Highlights included anticipating workload, cost and resource calculations, integrating services on both sides...
"We are a well-established player in the application life cycle management market and we also have a very strong version control product," stated Flint Brenton, CEO of CollabNet,, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
Unless your company can spend a lot of money on new technology, re-engineering your environment and hiring a comprehensive cybersecurity team, you will most likely move to the cloud or seek external service partnerships. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Darren Guccione, CEO of Keeper Security, revealed what you need to know when it comes to encryption in the cloud.
We're entering the post-smartphone era, where wearable gadgets from watches and fitness bands to glasses and health aids will power the next technological revolution. With mass adoption of wearable devices comes a new data ecosystem that must be protected. Wearables open new pathways that facilitate the tracking, sharing and storing of consumers’ personal health, location and daily activity data. Consumers have some idea of the data these devices capture, but most don’t realize how revealing and...
What are the successful IoT innovations from emerging markets? What are the unique challenges and opportunities from these markets? How did the constraints in connectivity among others lead to groundbreaking insights? In her session at @ThingsExpo, Carmen Feliciano, a Principal at AMDG, will answer all these questions and share how you can apply IoT best practices and frameworks from the emerging markets to your own business.
Ask someone to architect an Internet of Things (IoT) solution and you are guaranteed to see a reference to the cloud. This would lead you to believe that IoT requires the cloud to exist. However, there are many IoT use cases where the cloud is not feasible or desirable. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products at Bsquare Corporation, will discuss the strategies that exist to extend intelligence directly to IoT devices and sensors, freeing them from the constraints of ...
You think you know what’s in your data. But do you? Most organizations are now aware of the business intelligence represented by their data. Data science stands to take this to a level you never thought of – literally. The techniques of data science, when used with the capabilities of Big Data technologies, can make connections you had not yet imagined, helping you discover new insights and ask new questions of your data. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Sarbjit Sarkaria, data science team lead ...
Extracting business value from Internet of Things (IoT) data doesn’t happen overnight. There are several requirements that must be satisfied, including IoT device enablement, data analysis, real-time detection of complex events and automated orchestration of actions. Unfortunately, too many companies fall short in achieving their business goals by implementing incomplete solutions or not focusing on tangible use cases. In his general session at @ThingsExpo, Dave McCarthy, Director of Products...
Traditional IT, great for stable systems of record, is struggling to cope with newer, agile systems of engagement requirements coming straight from the business. In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, William Morrish, General Manager of Product Sales at Interoute, outlined ways of exploiting new architectures to enable both systems and building them to support your existing platforms, with an eye for the future. Technologies such as Docker and the hyper-convergence of computing, networking and sto...
WebRTC is bringing significant change to the communications landscape that will bridge the worlds of web and telephony, making the Internet the new standard for communications. Cloud9 took the road less traveled and used WebRTC to create a downloadable enterprise-grade communications platform that is changing the communication dynamic in the financial sector. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Leo Papadopoulos, CTO of Cloud9, discussed the importance of WebRTC and how it enables companies to focus...
With an estimated 50 billion devices connected to the Internet by 2020, several industries will begin to expand their capabilities for retaining end point data at the edge to better utilize the range of data types and sheer volume of M2M data generated by the Internet of Things. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Don DeLoach, CEO and President of Infobright, discussed the infrastructures businesses will need to implement to handle this explosion of data by providing specific use cases for filterin...
IoT generates lots of temporal data. But how do you unlock its value? You need to discover patterns that are repeatable in vast quantities of data, understand their meaning, and implement scalable monitoring across multiple data streams in order to monetize the discoveries and insights. Motif discovery and deep learning platforms are emerging to visualize sensor data, to search for patterns and to build application that can monitor real time streams efficiently. In his session at @ThingsExpo, ...
Early adopters of IoT viewed it mainly as a different term for machine-to-machine connectivity or M2M. This is understandable since a prerequisite for any IoT solution is the ability to collect and aggregate device data, which is most often presented in a dashboard. The problem is that viewing data in a dashboard requires a human to interpret the results and take manual action, which doesn’t scale to the needs of IoT.
Internet of @ThingsExpo has announced today that Chris Matthieu has been named tech chair of Internet of @ThingsExpo 2016 Silicon Valley. The 6thInternet of @ThingsExpo will take place on November 1–3, 2016, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.