Welcome!

Agile Computing Authors: Rishi Bhargava, Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz, Ben Uher, Derek Weeks

News Feed Item

Stand Up For Democracy State Wide Coalition Analysis Of Proposed Emergency Manager Replacement Law Ignores The Will Of The Voters Who Rejected Old Law

Same law, different day is proposed by right-wing leadership in Lansing

DETROIT, Dec. 10, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The organizers of the statewide coalition Stand Up for Democracy continue to urge state leaders to respect the will of voters who resoundingly rejected PA 4 aka the emergency manager law with a new replacement law. An analysis of that law that is expected to pass in the lame duck session this week demonstrates it is clearly that the same as the one voters rejected.

The analysis was created by Nick Ciaramitaro, a lobbyist for Michigan AFSCME Council 25. The organization is one of the partners in the Stand Up for Democracy statewide coalition.

Senate Bill 865 (H-5) analysis

Senate Bill 865 (H-5) will likely be considered by both the House and the Senate Tuesday.  The bill re-enacts many of the worst provisions of PA 4, in effect negating much the decision made by the people of the State of Michigan.  Worse, the proponents of this bill (including Governor Snyder) are misrepresenting much of its contents expecting that most legislators will not read the actual language of the bill.  Here is what the bill does.  To demonstrate the lengths to which the Snyder Administration will go to mislead voters I have put the portions of the bill that are identical to PA 4 in red in a copy of this text on the Michigan AFSCME Council 25 website.

Title

Even the title of the bill belies the dishonesty of those who suggest that this is not re-enactment of PA 4.  In provides that this is a bill to (among other things):

  • "to provide for review, management, management, planning and control of financial operation of local units of government and school districts"
  • "to provide for the appointment and to prescribe the powers and duties of an emergency manager for a local unit of government or school district
  • "to provide for the modification or termination of contracts under certain circumstances"

The title also makes clear that the bill provides for an appropriation thereby nullifying the right of referendum.

­Section 1­

­The short title for the bill is the "local government and school district fiscal responsibility act"

Section 2

Definitions

Section 3

Legislation intent language virtually identical to PA 4

Section 4

Provisions for preliminary reviews by the "state financial authorities" same as in PA 4 ("state financial authorities defined in Section 2 as the State Treasurer for municipalities and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction) to determine "probable financial stress" under same criteria as PA 4 including "other facts or circumstances … in the treasurer's sole discretion for a municipal government  … or .. in the state treasurer's or superintendent of public instruction's sole discretion for a school district …"

There is a brief 5-day "response period" provided for local governments to react to interim reports before the issuance of the preliminary report that may be new.

If there is a preliminary finding of probable financial stress a review team is formed.  The composition and responsibilities of the review team are the same as PA 4 except that the review team is not empowered to negotiate a consent agreement at this point.  Actions of previous review teams under PA 4 are ratified.  In fact, all prior acts are ratified. 

There continues to be no requirement that review teams comply with either the Open Meetings Act or the Freedom of Information Act.

Section 5

The bill requires that the review team hold at least one public "information" meeting in the local jurisdiction.  There is no requirement that any comments be taken from the public. 

Most of the rest of the powers and responsibilities including reporting and appeal procedures are essentially the same as PA 4.  This includes findings of "structural" operating deficits (undefined) and open ended, unsubstantiated conclusion of things that may happen in the future. 

The major change is that the review team is restricted to one of only two findings:  there is or there is not a "financial emergency."  This point becomes more significant later as the new proposal does allow options as will be explained later.

Section 6

This section deals with the Governor's determination based on the report of the review team and the appeal process is essentially the same as PA 4 except the determination is limited to the question of whether or not a financial emergency exists.

Section 7

This section contains the major change from PA 4.  Rather than a fiscal emergency triggering receivership, it triggers 4 options:

  • a consent agreement
  • an emergency manager
  • a neutral evaluation process
  • Chapter 9 bankruptcy.

Each of these options is explained in detail in subsequent sections of the bill.  The local government must make up its mind with 7 days (and an elected mayor must join in the agreement if there is one) but the default if no decision is made locally is the neutral evaluation process.

Section 8

Provisions concerning a consent agreement are essentially the same with one major exception.  A default can lead to either an emergency manager or the neutral evaluation process at the choice of the State Treasurer.  It also adds the power to waive the suspension of PERA (which currently exists under PA 4) to the State Treasurer.

Section 9

This section governs the appointment of an emergency manager and is essentially unchanged from PA 4 except that a local government is given the authority to remove an emergency manager by a 2/3 vote after one year in office.  Such action may but is not required to result in the removal of the unit of government from receivership.  In addition, a local unit of government may petition the State Treasurer or the Governor to remove an emergency manager in the first year.  The State agrees to assume the salary (but not expenses or other costs) of the manager.  All existing emergency financial managers are grand parented in.

Section 10

This section reinstates the powers of an emergency manager essentially the same as under PA 4. 

Section 11

This section reinstates powers of an emergency manager essentially identical to PA 4. 

Section 12

Reenacts all of the onerous powers of an emergency manager as provided in PA 4 including contract abrogation, dissolution of communities, usurpation of powers of local officials and more.

Section 13

Reenacts provisions of PA 4 suspending wages and benefits of local elected officials during receivership.

Section 14

Reenacts powers of an Emergency Manager of a school district as provided in PA 4.

Section 15

Requires the approval of the State Treasurer to sell assets valued at more than $50,000.  Reenacts provisions of PA 4 protecting collective agreement provisions for payment of benefits upon the active duty death of a police officer or firefighter.

Section 16

Provides for referral of criminal matters to the Attorney General and local prosecutor as in PA 4.

Section 17

Reporting requirements of an Emergency Manager similar to PA 4.

Section 18

Provisions for an emergency manager to recommend Chapter 9 bankruptcy to the Governor and the State Treasurer.

Section 19

This section is one of the few "concessions" made to the demand of the people of the state of Michigan for local democracy and even here they mess it up. 

The section requires that before an emergency manager abrogates a collective bargaining agreement, borrows money or sells assets with a value in excess of $50,000, he/she shall submit the proposal to the local government.  The local government has 7 days to approve or disapprove the action.  If it does not act, the action is considered approved.  If it disapproves, it has 10 days to submit a fiscally equivalent option to the local emergency financial assistance loan board who then have 30 days to pick one.  The members of the local emergency financial assistance loan board are three members of the Governor's cabinet including and chaired by the State Treasurer. 

Section 20

Immunity and Attorney general responsibilities essentially the same as in PA 4.

Section 21

Two year carry over for budget and working conditions as in PA 4 and 1 year carryover of ordinances as in PA 4 from end of receivership.

Section 22

Allows the governor to impose "best practices" (undefined), a model charter or model charter provisions (undefined) and management training as a condition to the end of receivership. 

Section 23

Provides for an "advisory board" that excludes all local participation to continue state intervention as a transition from receivership at the option of the governor.  The board "advises" mostly its own members.  It does provide for open meetings act and freedom of information act application to this board. 

Section 24

Allows the governor to appoint a new emergency manager on his own initiative upon recommendation of the transition board provided for above.

Section 25

Provides for a neutral arbitration option similar to a successful provision in California law with a number of seemingly harsh provisions including:

  • receivership if the local unit of government fails to send notice to all interested parties within 7 days of picking the option;
  • the unfettered right of the State Treasurer to reject a settlement reached through the neutral arbitration process;
  • inability to extend the process beyond 90 days when both parties agree that such an extension is warranted.

Section 26

Provides for ability of a local unit of government file under Chapter 9 of the federal bankruptcy act with the consent of the Governor. 

Section 27

Reenacts provisions of PA 4 concerning suspension of collective bargaining rights under receivership.

Section 28

Identical limitations on new taxes as in PA 4.

Section 29

Bulletin and rule authority for the State Treasurer and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Section 30

Reaffirms all actions taken heretofore under PA 4 and 72.

Section 31

Grandparents all existing emergency managers and emergency financial managers

Section 32

Immunity for all state players.

Section 33

Severability

Section 34 and 35

Appropriations to prevent another referendum

Enacting section 1

Repeals PA 72.

Enacting section 2.

Legislative intent that this act is a successor statute to PA 4 and attempts to incorporate changes to other acts that only applied to PA 4. 

Facebook

SOURCE Stand Up for Democracy

More Stories By PR Newswire

Copyright © 2007 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of PRNewswire content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of PRNewswire. PRNewswire shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

@ThingsExpo Stories
SYS-CON Events announced today that Auditwerx will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Auditwerx specializes in SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3 attestation services throughout the U.S. and Canada. As a division of Carr, Riggs & Ingram (CRI), one of the top 20 largest CPA firms nationally, you can expect the resources, skills, and experience of a much larger firm combined with the accessibility and attent...
In his session at @ThingsExpo, Eric Lachapelle, CEO of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), will provide an overview of various initiatives to certifiy the security of connected devices and future trends in ensuring public trust of IoT. Eric Lachapelle is the Chief Executive Officer of the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an international certification body. His role is to help companies and individuals to achieve professional, accredited and worldw...
In his General Session at 16th Cloud Expo, David Shacochis, host of The Hybrid IT Files podcast and Vice President at CenturyLink, investigated three key trends of the “gigabit economy" though the story of a Fortune 500 communications company in transformation. Narrating how multi-modal hybrid IT, service automation, and agile delivery all intersect, he will cover the role of storytelling and empathy in achieving strategic alignment between the enterprise and its information technology.
Microservices are a very exciting architectural approach that many organizations are looking to as a way to accelerate innovation. Microservices promise to allow teams to move away from monolithic "ball of mud" systems, but the reality is that, in the vast majority of organizations, different projects and technologies will continue to be developed at different speeds. How to handle the dependencies between these disparate systems with different iteration cycles? Consider the "canoncial problem" ...
The Internet of Things is clearly many things: data collection and analytics, wearables, Smart Grids and Smart Cities, the Industrial Internet, and more. Cool platforms like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, Intel's Galileo and Edison, and a diverse world of sensors are making the IoT a great toy box for developers in all these areas. In this Power Panel at @ThingsExpo, moderated by Conference Chair Roger Strukhoff, panelists discussed what things are the most important, which will have the most profound e...
Keeping pace with advancements in software delivery processes and tooling is taxing even for the most proficient organizations. Point tools, platforms, open source and the increasing adoption of private and public cloud services requires strong engineering rigor - all in the face of developer demands to use the tools of choice. As Agile has settled in as a mainstream practice, now DevOps has emerged as the next wave to improve software delivery speed and output. To make DevOps work, organization...
My team embarked on building a data lake for our sales and marketing data to better understand customer journeys. This required building a hybrid data pipeline to connect our cloud CRM with the new Hadoop Data Lake. One challenge is that IT was not in a position to provide support until we proved value and marketing did not have the experience, so we embarked on the journey ourselves within the product marketing team for our line of business within Progress. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Sum...
Web Real-Time Communication APIs have quickly revolutionized what browsers are capable of. In addition to video and audio streams, we can now bi-directionally send arbitrary data over WebRTC's PeerConnection Data Channels. With the advent of Progressive Web Apps and new hardware APIs such as WebBluetooh and WebUSB, we can finally enable users to stitch together the Internet of Things directly from their browsers while communicating privately and securely in a decentralized way.
DevOps is often described as a combination of technology and culture. Without both, DevOps isn't complete. However, applying the culture to outdated technology is a recipe for disaster; as response times grow and connections between teams are delayed by technology, the culture will die. A Nutanix Enterprise Cloud has many benefits that provide the needed base for a true DevOps paradigm.
What sort of WebRTC based applications can we expect to see over the next year and beyond? One way to predict development trends is to see what sorts of applications startups are building. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Arin Sime, founder of WebRTC.ventures, will discuss the current and likely future trends in WebRTC application development based on real requests for custom applications from real customers, as well as other public sources of information,
In his General Session at 17th Cloud Expo, Bruce Swann, Senior Product Marketing Manager for Adobe Campaign, explored the key ingredients of cross-channel marketing in a digital world. Learn how the Adobe Marketing Cloud can help marketers embrace opportunities for personalized, relevant and real-time customer engagement across offline (direct mail, point of sale, call center) and digital (email, website, SMS, mobile apps, social networks, connected objects).
With the introduction of IoT and Smart Living in every aspect of our lives, one question has become relevant: What are the security implications? To answer this, first we have to look and explore the security models of the technologies that IoT is founded upon. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Nevi Kaja, a Research Engineer at Ford Motor Company, will discuss some of the security challenges of the IoT infrastructure and relate how these aspects impact Smart Living. The material will be delivered i...
"My role is working with customers, helping them go through this digital transformation. I spend a lot of time talking to banks, big industries, manufacturers working through how they are integrating and transforming their IT platforms and moving them forward," explained William Morrish, General Manager Product Sales at Interoute, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Ocean9will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Ocean9 provides cloud services for Backup, Disaster Recovery (DRaaS) and instant Innovation, and redefines enterprise infrastructure with its cloud native subscription offerings for mission critical SAP workloads.
Your homes and cars can be automated and self-serviced. Why can't your storage? From simply asking questions to analyze and troubleshoot your infrastructure, to provisioning storage with snapshots, recovery and replication, your wildest sci-fi dream has come true. In his session at @DevOpsSummit at 20th Cloud Expo, Dan Florea, Director of Product Management at Tintri, will provide a ChatOps demo where you can talk to your storage and manage it from anywhere, through Slack and similar services ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that Linux Academy, the foremost online Linux and cloud training platform and community, will exhibit at SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Linux Academy was founded on the belief that providing high-quality, in-depth training should be available at an affordable price. Industry leaders in quality training, provided services, and student certification passes, its goal is to c...
"delaPlex is a software development company. We do team-based outsourcing development," explained Mark Rivers, COO and Co-founder of delaPlex Software, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 18th Cloud Expo, held June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY.
SYS-CON Events announced today that SoftLayer, an IBM Company, has been named “Gold Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 18th Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 7-9, 2016, at the Javits Center in New York, New York. SoftLayer, an IBM Company, provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. SoftLayer’s customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Technologic Systems Inc., an embedded systems solutions company, will exhibit at SYS-CON's @ThingsExpo, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. Technologic Systems is an embedded systems company with headquarters in Fountain Hills, Arizona. They have been in business for 32 years, helping more than 8,000 OEM customers and building over a hundred COTS products that have never been discontinued. Technologic Systems’ pr...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CA Technologies has been named “Platinum Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 20th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 6-8, 2017, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY, and the 21st International Cloud Expo®, which will take place October 31-November 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. CA Technologies helps customers succeed in a future where every business – from apparel to energy – is being rewritten by software. From ...